I’m Still Furious DC Cut A Crucial Superman Scene That Perfectly Explained Henry Cavill’s Most Controversial Man Of Steel Moment

Man of Steel was great, but I"m still upset that the debut DCEU movie"s reputation was tarnished by a controversial moment that just one deleted scene would have justified. Man of Steel was the first movie to launch the DCEU back in 2013, setting the tone for what to expect from DC"s first cinematic universe. At this point, the MCU had been in full swing for five years, even tying together its constituent narratives with the hugely successful The Avengers in 2012. This put extra pressure on the DCEU to differentiate itself from its rival franchise.
Man of Steel succeeded in that regard, bringing a level of gritty realism to the latest Superman movie that flew in the face of the MCU"s more lighthearted take on its comic book adaptations. Unfortunately, this garnered mixed reactions, with some struggling to reconcile the inherently fantastical nature of Superman with the darker story that it was trying to tell. I loved it, and I think the early reviews may have been too quick to criticize now that hindsight sheds new light on the debut movie.
Henry Cavill's Killing Of Zod Overshadowed How Great Man Of Steel Was Some Audiences Were Put Off By Superman's Fateful Decision Much of the controversy surrounding Man of Steel concerned General Zod and his battle with Superman. Their battle tore through Metropolis and caused enough devastation to warrant legitimate questions about whether Superman truly benefited the world. This was, after all, part of the reason Batman decided to try and take him down in the sequel, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - which fared much worse in the court of public opinion than its predecessor.


[圖擷取自網路,如有疑問請私訊]

本篇
不想錯過? 請追蹤FB專頁!    
前一頁 後一頁